So this " straight guy" solved a problem for sexism which feminism couldn't ..
Gee ! Just have a mini penis ....simple
No vagina,no problem!
Apparently ,vagina is badly designed ,secretive and makes women unhappy !!!
Women live in shame because of their poorly designed anatomy ,wow ! what a genius..
Sometimes i wonder what it is, men are more retarded or more illiterate .
Trans men will always be a female ❤️ trans women will always be male ❤️ there you go
“You will never be a woman” lmao it’s nice to be affirmed as a trans man. Transphobia failed successfully
Excluding the crucial fact that office jobs pay you an income….if staying home to raise children and do chores and bake bread was really so much easier and more joyful than working in an office on some objective level, why aren’t men doing it? Why aren’t they chomping at the bit to be ~leisurely house husbands~ to a working wife? Why aren’t they stepping up to depend solely on someone else’s income in exchange for round-the-clock domestic labor, if it’s really as blissful and their propaganda suggests? Curious.
Where the fuck did the grass go? The color? The leaves? The contrast? You’re telling me the left isn’t Warzone or some shit?
The oblivion remake is a soulless, ugly piece of crap that completely disregards the vibrancy and whimsy of the original. I will never stop hating it 💯
pet peeve: when a male, a group of men or a male-dominated government/regime commit an act of incomprehensible violence and people lament the nature of “humans” or “people”.
do women that comment “but it’s itchy🥺i don’t like the feeling of prickly hair😔” under anti-shaving posts and videos realise that the itchiness and prickliness is a result of shaving? if you don’t shave the hair is soft, you don’t feel it at all. have they forgotten what it feels like to be unshaven? have they ever experienced it?
corporations be like “noooooo women please fuck your natural predator or we won’t have more consumers to generate more profits in the next decade pleaaasssuuuhhh😩😩”
yeah i believe in transmisogyny. those dudes are misogynistic as hell
People be like, “Oh, you’re reducing womanhood to just having a vagina.”
And I’m like... yeah....
The fact I was born with a vulva was the entire baseline of the sexism I faced growing up and still face every day.
It’s not some abstract identity or feeling. It’s the brutal, physical reality that shaped how the world treated me from day one.
So don’t tell me womanhood isn’t tied to the body when that body has been the frontline of every fight I’ve had to survive.
I love my body, if I’m being honest: Like, thank you for carrying me through all this kind of love.
But it’s also just a body. It’s weird. It leaks. It gets sore. It’s lopsided and unpredictable at times, my back hurts a lot.
Because it’s human, my vessel, not my whole story.
But unfortunately, outside factors have tried to disrupt that and tried to make me distrust this body.
Tried to convince me it was too much, too little, too wrong, too dangerous, too female.
They taught me to flinch at my reflection and to see my body as something to fix, cover, offer, or hide.
All because I have a vulva.
A vagina.
Labia.
Ovaries.
A uterus.
Tubes.
Mammary glands.
That’s all it took.
Not my words. Not my thoughts. Not my heart or how I treat people.
Just the fact that I was born in this body with these parts and suddenly the world decided what I deserved.
Pain. Shame. Control. Violation. Comparison. Dismissal.
They built entire systems to punish me for being born with organs I didn’t choose.
And then had the audacity to tell me I was reducing womanhood by naming the body they’ve spent centuries trying to control.
So yeah I’m a woman because I have a vagina.
Deal with it 💋
On April 16th 2025 the US federal government has proposed to change the interpretation of the endangered species act so that it no longer protects habitat.
This is open for public comment until the end of May 19th. Please comment and make your voice heard.
Wildlife need their habitat. If the ESA redefines harm so that habitat is no longer protected, the implications for wildlife would be catastrophic.