Matilda —¿Siempre es así de dura la vida o nada más cuando se es chico?
León— Siempre es así.
📽 : The Professional (1994)
LIVRES CENSURÉS PAR LES AUTORITÉS À TRAVERS LES SIÈCLES
BOOKS CENSORED BY LEGAL AUTHORITIES OVER THE YEARS PART V
Salomé - Oscar Wilde (1891)
Histoire d'O - Pauline Réage a.k.a. Dominique Aury (1954)
Mademoiselle La Quintinie - George Sand a.k.a Amantine Aurore Lucile Dupin (1863)
carmela corleone + pears vs diamonds (1917 vs 1958)
Listen, I might be playing the devils advocate, but I don't think Dany's fate in the GoT finale was due to D&D being sexist.I think it was just because D&D can't write for crap.
It’s not about intent.
Allow me to begin by saying that I completely understand the knee-jerk reaction that people have to the term ‘sexism’. It’s very polarizing, and when men read the term, they immediately go on the offensive. That’s not what I want at all. I don’t use the term to alienate or exclude men, I use it because it’s the dictionary definition of what I’m trying to convey:
sex·ism (noun): "prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex.“
That said, allow me to play devil’s advocate here and say that I do not believe the writers intended to have an underlying sexist message. They are more oblivious than they are malicious. It is born of sheer ignorance (lack of knowledge or information) and the privilege to ignore it because, as males, it doesn’t affect them.
Let’s put aside the dozens of articles that came out after the finale calling out the sexism. You guys know me, I like to pull receipts, cite my sources, and throw in some visuals to help aid my point.
For most of the 70+ hours of Game of Thrones, Daenerys actually does not fall victim to these sexist tropes. Honestly, that is what subverted my expectations for seven seasons. That Dany always teetered on the edge of these tired, overused tropes about women, yet she remained steadfast in her ruthless yet good nature, her moral compass was always aligned even if it didn’t match the viewers, and she was a gods-damned hero, straight through to episode four of season eight.
But the demoralizing reality is that Daenerys was hit with trope after trope in the last three episodes. In the final hours of the show, the writers pulled a bait-and-switch, giving us a ‘shocking’ heel-tern whose only foreshadowing was a very bad retcon job full of double standards. And so many fans, such as yourself, justify it. Not because the show foreshadowed it, but because these tropes are so, so ingrained in our brains from decades of media feeding us these narratives that we now expect them.
“The Good Kingdom: A lovely, wealthy country ruled by a benevolent king, a wise prince, and a fair princess loved by the populace. But what’s that? There’s a queen? Oh, brother, we’re in trouble.”
“This character has a familial or romantic relationship with a protagonist, which allows creators to derive heart-wrenching sorrow from her death.”
“Women are often divided into “breeders” and “the barren,” with the latter coming off as cool and distant at best, and malicious and desperate at worst.“
“A double standard occurs when members of two or more groups are treated differently regarding the same thing. Gender is one of the most common causes of double standards.”
“This trope characterizes women as less rational, disciplined, and emotionally stable than men, and thus more prone to mood swings, irrational overreactions, and mental illness.”
“What’s the only type of woman more dangerous than a Mama Bear? A woman who’s been dumped or otherwise done wrong by her significant other. Especially if she’s been hiding some sanity problems.”
“Even if women have toughness, competence, strength or stability, it’s less than what their male peers are capable of.”
“They don’t want a young woman, or they don’t want any woman, or they just don’t want this particular woman on the throne.”
Tropes in and of themselves are not bad, but very outdated tropes that are associated with the emotional or mental ‘fragility’ of women are. Why? Because they reinforce deep-seated and subconscious stereotypes of women that audiences hold.
People have been turning to art (including literature) for years for meaning, for philosophical guidance. Most people in my own country turn to one book to both find and justify their morality (the bible).
“Literature offers not just a window into the culture of diverse regions, but also the society, the politics; it’s the only place where we can keep track of ideas.”―Reza Aslan
It’s not just a show. The art and media we consume helps shape who we are, for better or worse. When men refuse to consider the consequence of their sexist narratives simply because it doesn’t affect their own lives, it inadvertently causes harm for others who don’t share their privilege.
And it’s not just Daenerys. She’s just the figurehead.
There was a great article from BBC about how much women actually speak on Game of Thrones:
I can already hear the counter-argument brewing…
Yeah. There are. And that’s a problem, too.
Of the top-grossing 1,200 films from 2007 to 2018, 28% of films were led or co-led by women. Meanwhile, around 49.6 percent of the world’s population is female.
By featuring so few women and by giving women who are featured 20% of the airtime to speak their minds, the writers are unintentionally devaluing the speech and opinions of women. This inspires the audience to devalue women in a subconscious way.
Go ahead, tell me I’m wrong. Tell me I’m blowing this way out of proportion.
Tell me it’s just a show or a book and every single fan knows how to separate fiction from reality (they don’t, go look at Maisie William’s Instagram comments following her season eight sex scene for proof of that). Meanwhile, here in actual reality, we see things like this:
@thescarletgarden1990 informs me that over in Italy, political figures are using Game of Thrones advertising in their campaigns, too:
What makes it worse is that, at least Donald Trump, identifies with House Stark. Or, those who rule the northerners. The people who showed their blatant racism toward the only two black named characters. And the writers never bothered to critique the problematic behavior, instead, rewarding their people with independence and driving those pesky evil foreigners ’back where they belong’.
I’ve barely had time to scroll my dash and I’ve already seen a troubling amount of harassment towards Dany fans via anon asks (including myself, though I just block the IP and delete but I wish I’d saved them for proof).
Why? Because the ending justifies their personal narrative, this bad writing confirms their worldview. Meanwhile, on the other side of the spectrum, the same thing is happening in reverse in response to the takedown of a figure like Daenerys Targaryen:
“Khaleesi’s heel turn is particularly troubling for fans who might have felt a true sense of connection to her character following her epic story arc, which has seen Dany escape some awful circumstances to literally walk through fire, free the slaves, bring Dragons to the north and help rally the troops to defeat the Night King. She has basically been Abraham Lincoln, Hercules and Winston Churchill combined into one person riding a dragon.” (x)
The point here is that the show is doing its audience of 19,300,000 viewers a great disservice by succumbing to very outdated tropes and double standards, and sending troubling messages as a result. For instance, a woman can do countless heroic or selfless things, but you should never trust her! She needs to be tempered. Women cannot wield power responsibly. There are endless messages you can take away from this ending and the dialogue that led us to the show’s conclusion (my personal favorite being ‘Cocks are important’).
And the fans who want to say 'you’re overreacting’ to everyone who speaks up against it are only aiding in this ongoing legacy of 85% male writers who get to tell our stories, poorly, and reap all the rewards.
Sure, all of this could be solely the result of ‘just bad writing’…
Nevertheless, it is what it is.
palmistry placements that may indicate certain natural traits or abilities related to witchcraft.
the mystic cross. “x” shaped cross located between the head and heart lines. indicates that spirituality, witch’s intuition, and acknowledgement of power or ability were understood at a very young age.
the psychic cross. “x” shaped cross located beneath:
the index finger: blessings from jupiter/zeus. wisdom, and a great capacity for knowledge. often destined to teach or impart.
the middle finger: blessings from saturn/cronus. intuition, and a great capacity for visceral power. often has natural ability working in dreams and meditations.
the ring finger: blessings from sun/apollo. attraction, and a great ability to naturally draw in your needs and desires. often powerful with enchantments.
the little finger: blessings from mercury/hermes. instinct, and a great natural ability for practice. often adopts new methods with ease and natural talent.
the psychic triangle. triangular shape located beneath the ring finger. indicates that in this life, or another, you have chosen to suppress your abilities. they are likely powerful, but potentially caused harm- intentionally, or not. (this does not mean they are unreachable, it more likely encourages you to work very consciously.)
the healer’s mark. a series of parallel lines located beneath the little finger. indicates powerful healing abilities; the more lines, the greater the gift.
the traveller’s mark. a series of parallel lines located beneath the mount of the moon. indicates that there is an innate talent and drive in travelling both the physical and the astral planes. a natural ability for astral projection; the more lines, the greater the gift.
I highly, highly recommend checking out the documentary GLOW: The Story of the Gorgeous Ladies of Wrestling. I stumbled across it a few years ago and really enjoyed it.
It’s currently on Netflix, so if you’ve finished binging the new series inspired by the ladies of 80s wrestling, give the documentary a look and hear from the real women who hopped into the ring… including some of the in-ring personas that were clearly the source material for the characters that made it onscreen like Mountain Fiji (“Machu Picchu”), Colonel Ninotchka (“Zoya the Destroya”), Americana (“Liberty Belle”), The Housewives (“The Beatdown Biddies”) and more.
Well, @nightmaredaisy asked me about this and so I made a little list :D these are some of my favorite period dramas. Be aware that some of these are biographical films and/or short television serials, mostly produced by BBC and thus can be quite long XD
Andersen, Life Without Love (2006) [biographical fiction film based on the life of H.C Andersen]
Jane Eyre (2006)
Chéri (2009) [My personal fave <3]
Les Miserables (1998)
Mary Reilly (1996)
A Little Chaos (2015)
The Piano (1993)
Bright Star (2009) [biographical fiction film based on the life of John Keats]
Modigliani (2004) [biographical fiction film based on the life of Amedeo Modigliani]
Creation (2009) [biographical fiction film based on the life of Charles Darwin]
North & South (2004) - [My mom’s favorite :3]
Neverland (2004) [biographical fiction film based on the life of James Barrie]
Amadeus (1984) [biographical fiction film based on the life of W.A.Mozart]
Girl with a Pearl Earring (2003)
The Scarlet Letter (2015)
The English Patient (1996)
Far from the Madding Crowd (2015)
The Great Gatsby (1974) [I like the Robert Redford movie better than the Di Caprio one.]
The Scarlet Pimpernel (1982)
Elisabeth the Golden Age (2007) [biographical fiction film based on the life of Queen Elisabeth I]
Goya’s Ghosts (2006) [biographical fiction film -partially- based on the life of Francisco Goya]
Special mentions even if these aren’t ‘real’ period dramas:
Midnight in Paris (2011)
The Theory of Everything (2014) [biographical fiction film based on the life of Stephen Hawking]
Russian fairy tales :
Tale of the Dead Tsarevna and the Seven Bogatyrs (1951)
The Scarlet Flower (1952)
The Snow Maiden (1952)
Sister Alenushka and Brother Ivanushka (1953)
The Magic Bird (1953)
The Twelve Months (1956)
The Snow Queen (1957)
Vasilisa the Beautiful (1977)
What are your favourite pieces of classical music?
I don’t have the slightest musical education so my apologies for the possible abuse of the term “classical” but lately I’ve grown a special affection for the following pieces:
Bach-Capriccio on the departure of a beloved brother- (the way it starts as a grave farewell and then becomes light reminds me of Catullus 65) Cello Suite No.1 and Concertos for Oboe
Corelli- La Follia (or Vivaldi’s version, if I’m feeling extra extra)
Monteverdi- Zefiro Torna, Lamento della Ninfa and many of his madrigals
Jean Baptiste Lully- Armide
Franz Schubert- Serenade, Fantasy in F Minor
Frédéric Chopin- Nocturne, Funeral March, La Polonaise (reminds me of dziady!)
Felix Mendelssohn- Midsummer Night’s Dream
Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky- Rococo Variation, Pas de deux from the Nutcracker
I’m in love with the Impressionists: Ravel’s Le Tombeau de Couperin was the first work to make me interested in classical music, and I also love Jeux d’eau, Daphnis et Chloe, Introduction and Allegro, String Quartet- Assez Vif
Claude Debussy: Suite Bergamasque
Erik Satie: Gymnopédies and Gnossiennes (for cloudy Sunday mornings)
♀ God is a Woman ♀
➳ Capitoline Wolf (11th-12th centuries)
➳ Secluded Mountain (late 19th century), Yan Borun
➳ Creation of Adam (1508-12), Michelangelo
➳ The Thinker (1904), Auguste Rodin
1 - Pandora, Jules Joseph Lefebvre 2 - Night and Her Daughter Sleep, Mary L. Macomber 3 - Spadajaca gwiazda Falling Star, Witold Pruszkowski 4 - Empress Elisabeth of Austria, Franz Xaver Winterhalter