Master 1,775 S&P Level Tagged: Market Bounces Perfectly $$$

VIDEO: Time Cover Calls Christie ‘Elephant in the Room’ 

Time’s latest cover features NJ Gov. Chris Christie with the words “the elephant in the room.”

View Post

In an exclusive CNBC interview, Kenneth Jacobs, Lazard, chairman & CEO discusses the financial crisis, the global economy and CEO confidence. Jacobs says, "CEO confidence is a factor of the real economy." CNBC's Kayla Tausche reports.

How advertisers became the NSA’s best friend

This week, new documents from NSA leaker Edward Snowden arrived with some troubling revelations: the NSA has been piggybacking on Google’s network, using the company’s “preferences” cookie to follow users from site to site, proving their identity before targeting them with malware. It means the agency has tapped into one of the most popular features on the web and the core of Google’s multibillion-dollar ad-targeting empire. Instead of just targeting ads and saving preferences, the infrastructure is being used to find people the NSA is interested in and silently infect their devices with malware. 

Michael Graves on Starchitects’ Pitfalls, Detroit’s Future, And The Industry’s Names To Watch

VIDEO: Mary J. Blige’s Father ‘Critical’ After Stabbing

Mary J. Blige’s father Thomas is stabbed multiple times in the neck and is in a critical…

View Post

Washington State tears off GMO label bill

Washington state experienced an expensive fight over the labeling of genetically modified foods or GMOs. The bill in question would have mandated that all foods containing GMOs are labeled clearly for consumers, including cereals, soft drinks chips and many other items. The bill was ultimately voted down by Washington voters by a 10 point margin.

The for labeling campaign calling for greater consumer transparency through labels of all products containing GMOs. The against labeling side claimed that labeling GMO foods would create an increased cost to consumers. The opposing side had a lot of large financial backers including the Grocery Manufacturers Association which represents big food corporations such as Campbell Foods, General Mills, Hillshire Brands, and PepsiCo. Together they raised contributed $1 million dollars to oppose the bill. Other donations against the bill came from big agricultural companies such as DuPont, Monsanto and Bayer CropScience. Their contributions totaled around $11 million. So now that the bill didn't pass and GMOs are not labeled we should ask ourselves, how much of our food is GMO and does this make a difference? If we look at the GMOs crops grown today, around 95% of U.S. commodity crops are GMO. This includes 94$ of sugar beets, 90% of soybeans, and 88% of cotton and feed corn. Papaya are an interesting case that demonstrates the benefits of GMOs. In the 1980s basically all papaya was wiped out of Hawaii due to a ringspot virus. Today papaya's grow again on the islands due to virus resistant GMO crops. In the actual stores GMO foods include basically any processed foods with sugar. For the most part non-processed foods are not GMO, for example tomatoes, potatoes, wheat and rice are not GMO in the U.S. Now there is a lot of talk about GMO foods being unhealthy. This for all intents and purposes is not true. If we look at sugar as a general example, by the time it is processed and put into your food the sugar has no chemical difference between non-GMO sugar. There are also claims that crops that are genetically modified with other animals DNA are some how bad for us. The idea that DNA is somehow owned by one animal or another is also absurd. DNA and RNA create the language or code that define life. Essentially all living things have this code and share similar parts of it. Taking code from a fish to create corn with protein may sound weird but it is just a length of code. Humans may share 99% of our DNA with apes but we also share 30% of our DNA with a potatoes. I think GMOs are a amazing step forward for science, being able to make crops resist viruses and grow more effectively with less water has huge agricultural advantages.

Lazard hits new 52 week high

Zachs Equity Research

November 16th 2013.

Shares of Lazard Ltd.  reached a new 52-week high, touching $41.66 at the second half of the trading session on Nov 18. However, the stock closed the session at $41.26, which reflects a solid year-to-date return of 34.7%.The trading volume for the session was 0.5 million shares. Despite the strong price appreciation, this Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) stock has plenty of upside left, given its strong estimate revisions over the last 30 days and expected long-term earnings growth of 12.0%. Growth Drivers Impressive third-quarter 2013 results comprising a positive earnings surprise of 31.64%, top-line growth, a strong capital position and higher assets under management (AUM) were the primary driving factors for Lazard. On Oct 24, Lazard reported third-quarter 2013 adjusted earnings of 46 cents per share, outpacing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 35 cents. Moreover, this compared favorably with 26 cents earned in the prior-year quarter. On a year-over-year basis, Lazard experienced 10.0% rise in both revenues and AUM, which acted as positives for the quarter. AUM growth resulted from market appreciation and rise in net inflows. Additionally, the company’s capital ratios depict its strong position. However, a 4.3% increase in expenses was the headwind for the quarter. Further, Lazard has delivered positive earnings surprises in 3 out of the last 4 quarters with an average beat of 35.95%. Estimate Revisions Show Potency Over the last 30 days, 3 out of 7 estimates for 2013 have been revised upward, lifting the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 4.7% to $1.77 per share. For 2014, 4 out of 7 estimates moved north, helping the Zacks Consensus Estimate advance 6.1% to $2.44 per share.