Like. If You Read “you Can’t Change Your Sex” But Hear ‘your Sex Defines How You Must Live Your

Like. If you read “you can’t change your sex” but hear ‘your sex defines how you must live your life’ that’s a problem you need to deal with because male and female aren’t lifestyles

More Posts from Postrigbite and Others

3 years ago

lady gaga's joe calderone persona is like IT for me like she gets it she understands everything i feel she's the moment she's everything i want to be

2 years ago

A member of anti-riot police who has arrested a student shoots directly at an Iranian citizen when he notices he is being filmed.

4 years ago

purge of 2002? of 2012? what ARE those?

Oh, how quickly the past is forgotten. 

They are part of the reason A03 is a thing now. Not the whole reason, but part of it. 

The Great Purges of 2002 and 2012 are when ff.net got a wild hair up their ass about THINK OF THE CHILDREN and nuked any fic posted on there that was explicit. Thousands upon thousands of nc-17 smutfics were lost.

It’s what led to the creation of alternate hosting sites for smutty fic…AdultFanfiction was the one I went to…but thousands of fics would never be recovered. 

3 years ago

it’s time we start oppressing ppl that use the word “hubby”

2 years ago

Your OPSEC is Bad and You Should Feel Bad

Okay so one of the many things that drives me absolutely nuts about most TV shows and (some) books that involve secret or classified information or secure facilities is how absolutely not secure everything is, so these are a few basic things that people get wrong:

You can't carry around classified information. There are, I assume, exceptions in specific cases, though they are assuredly very carefully managed, but random intel agent #12 cannot legally just take home classified information so they can work on it at home. That's incredibly illegal. And that's for a reason--secure facilities are, as the name suggests, secure. Everywhere else is varying levels of not secure. Even for people working with regular business or government materials on their work phone or laptop, there are varying levels of strict rules about where you can leave it, how to report a lost device, and not keeping it in checked bags.

Badges should be innocuous and limited in visible information. Any sensible security system doesn't have badges that are numbered/colored/otherwise identified by access level, because that is a really easy way to identify targets for thieves/people who want to break in. American federal ID cards (CAC for military, PIV for civilian) have really specific layouts. Some companies distinguish between full time employees, interns, vendors, etc in their cards.

Badges shouldn't be displayed outside of the office. This is not really followed by real people (if you get on the metro on DC you will see a wide variety of visible badges), but displaying a badge is not security-wise because 1) it makes them easier to steal, and 2) it can make you a target.

Names/access level/information shouldn't be openly announced. I'm looking at you, MCU Spider-Man fanfiction. Just. Don't.

Confidential/classified information shouldn't be openly discussed. Stop having your characters talk about confidential or classified information in front of people who shouldn't know it, or even just out in the open at all. They shouldn't be telling their parents, their friends, their spouses, etc. Even businesses or government buildings that deal with sensitive information, there may be spaces where certain things can or can't be discussed, and employees/contractors will go through approximately 8 million trainings on where you can't discuss certain information. This also involves erasing whiteboards, locking computers, etc.

You can't have cell phones in certain secure facilities. People shouldn't be having their cell phones with them in SCIFs. This prohibition extends to all things that can be recording devices, including furbies.

2 years ago
The crash dummy aimed at protecting women drivers
BBC News
Researchers in Sweden are close to completing an industry-first average female crash test dummy.

Since the 1970s, crash test dummies - mechanical surrogates of the human body - have been used to determine car safety.

The technology is used to estimate the effectiveness of seatbelts and safety features in new vehicle designs.

Until now the most commonly used dummy has been based on the average male build and weight.

However, women represent about half of all drivers and are more prone to injury in like-for-like accidents.

The dummy that is sometimes used as a proxy for women is a scaled-down version of the male one, roughly the size of a 12-year-old girl.

At 149cm tall (4ft 8ins) and weighing 48kg (7st 5lb), it represents the smallest 5% of women by the standards of the mid-1970s.

However, a team of Swedish engineers has finally developed the first dummy, or to use the more technical term - seat evaluation tool - designed on the body of the average woman.

Their dummy is 162cm (5ft 3ins) tall and weighs 62kg (9st 7lbs), more representative of the female population.

So why have safety regulators not asked for it before now?

"You can see that this is a bias," said Tjark Kreuzinger, who specialises in the field for Toyota in Europe. "When all the men in the meetings decide, they tend to look to their feet and say 'this is it'.

"I would never say that anybody does it intentionally but it's just the mere fact that it's typically a male decision - and that's why we do not have [average] female dummies."

Several times a day in a lab in the Swedish city of Linköping, road accidents are simulated and the consequences are analysed. The sensors and transducers within the dummy provide potentially lifesaving data, measuring the precise physical forces exerted on each body part in a crash event.

The team record data including velocity of impact, crushing force, bending, torque of the body and braking rates.

They are focused on seeing what happens to the biomechanics of the dummy during low-impact rear collisions.

When a woman is in a car crash she is up to three times more likely to suffer whiplash injuries in rear impacts in comparison with a man, according to US government data. Although whiplash is not usually fatal, it can lead to physical disabilities - some of which can be permanent.

It is these statistics that drive Astrid Linder, the director of traffic safety at the Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, who is leading the research in Linköping.

"We know from injury statistics that if we look at low severity impacts females are at higher risk.

"So, in order to ensure that you identify the seats that have the best protection for both parts of the population, we definitely need to have the part of the population at highest risk represented," she told the BBC.

Dr Linder believes her research can help shape the way cars are specified in the future and she stresses the key differences between men and women. Females are shorter and lighter than males, on average, and they have different muscle strengths.

Because of this they physically respond differently in a car crash.

"We have differences in the shape of the torso and the centre of gravity and the outline of our hips and pelvis," she explained.

But Dr Linder will still need regulators to enforce the use of the average female she has developed.

Currently there is no legal requirement for car safety tests for rear impact collisions to be carried out on anything other than the average man.

Although some car companies are already using them in their own safety tests they are not yet used in EU or US regulatory tests.

Engineers are starting to create more diverse dummies, including dummies that represent babies, elderly and overweight people.

The average female dummy in Linköping has a fully flexible spine, which means the team can look at what happens to the whole spine, from the head to the lower back, when a woman is injured.

US company Humanetics is the largest manufacturer of crash test dummies worldwide and is seen as the leading voice when it comes to the precision of the technology.

CEO Christopher O'Connor told the BBC he believes that safety has "advanced significantly over the last 20, 30, 40 years" but it "really hasn't taken into account the differences between a male and a female".

"You can't have the same device to test a man and a woman. We're not going to crack the injuries we are seeing today unless we put sensors there to measure those injuries.

"By measuring those injuries we can then have safer cars with safer airbags, with safer seatbelts, with safer occupant compartments that allow for different sizes."

The UN is examining its regulations on crash testing and will determine whether they need to be changed to better protect all drivers.

If changes are made to involve a crash test dummy representing the average female, there is an expectation that women will one day be safer behind the wheel.

"My hope for the future is that the safety of vehicles will be assessed for both parts of the population," Dr Linder said.

3 years ago

Watch this amazing video to show why being a pro shipper is ~illegal~

2 years ago

I'm late to this convo but it's alarming that the definition of misogyny has been watered down so far that people will position 'misogyny' and 'sex trafficking women' as separate things, as if the latter isn't an expression of the former. confining misogyny to 'inconsequential' slights, lesser, unimportant internet wank, while treating the violence harming women as this clouded, unnamed mystery without rhyme or reason has done irreparable damage to discussions of misogyny among online leftists. from denying the patriarchal role marginalized men play within their own communities, to branding the violence against gnc women as a sign that men are oppressed for being masculine, to framing feminism and the trans rights movement as inherently antithetical each other, to the ridiculous notion that misogyny is the least serious form of oppression, it's like basic feminist points have completely flown out of the fucking window. if not anything else please love and care for the women in your life beyond quirky posts about your favorite female fictional characters #feminism

3 years ago
Thank You @whitephobic-cyclonus For This I Owe You My Life

Thank you @whitephobic-cyclonus for this I owe you my life

2 years ago
Her Name Is Armita Abbasi. She's Only 21. She Was Kidnapped By IRGC Thugs, And They Raped Her So Many

Her name is Armita Abbasi. She's only 21. She was kidnapped by IRGC thugs, and they raped her so many times that she was brought to a hospital only to be kidnapped again. Please be her voice!!!

  • dreamy-snow
    dreamy-snow reblogged this · 2 months ago
  • glitchedoutofreality
    glitchedoutofreality liked this · 6 months ago
  • raddyretsuko1
    raddyretsuko1 liked this · 6 months ago
  • raddyretsuko1
    raddyretsuko1 reblogged this · 6 months ago
  • raddyretsuko
    raddyretsuko reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • imacockerspaniel
    imacockerspaniel liked this · 7 months ago
  • daydreamsanddemons
    daydreamsanddemons liked this · 7 months ago
  • limulus-rex
    limulus-rex liked this · 7 months ago
  • crazyalien87
    crazyalien87 reblogged this · 9 months ago
  • deviruo
    deviruo liked this · 10 months ago
  • lovetoliveby
    lovetoliveby reblogged this · 11 months ago
  • moth-attack
    moth-attack reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • jwarfs
    jwarfs reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • jwarfs
    jwarfs liked this · 1 year ago
  • nine-of-spades
    nine-of-spades reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • roseangelxfuma
    roseangelxfuma liked this · 1 year ago
  • michigood9618
    michigood9618 liked this · 1 year ago
  • givekyungsooasoloalbum
    givekyungsooasoloalbum reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • jeanssims
    jeanssims liked this · 1 year ago
  • aux-squiggle
    aux-squiggle liked this · 1 year ago
  • coolseverewinnerstudent-blog
    coolseverewinnerstudent-blog liked this · 1 year ago
  • goggysworld
    goggysworld liked this · 1 year ago
  • aspiringxxspinster
    aspiringxxspinster reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • affableidiot
    affableidiot liked this · 1 year ago
  • infirelight
    infirelight reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • thereisnoblogn4me
    thereisnoblogn4me liked this · 1 year ago
  • jorindasfate
    jorindasfate reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • nine-of-spades
    nine-of-spades reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • unsentimentaltranslator
    unsentimentaltranslator reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • polycistronic0
    polycistronic0 reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • radfemfuture
    radfemfuture reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • shadows-and-starlight
    shadows-and-starlight reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • strawberrycakefem
    strawberrycakefem reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • strawberrycakefem
    strawberrycakefem liked this · 1 year ago
  • almondbaby
    almondbaby reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • almondbaby
    almondbaby liked this · 1 year ago
  • violetwhiteandgreen
    violetwhiteandgreen liked this · 1 year ago
  • afateresignedoverfutileodds
    afateresignedoverfutileodds reblogged this · 1 year ago

welcome to my storage

395 posts

Explore Tumblr Blog
Search Through Tumblr Tags