Here's An Interesting Instance Of Andrew Manipulating The Audience: I've Seen Many People Say That This

the fact that I’ve actually had this happen multiple times when I’ve entered a new fandom is hilarious like what do you MEAN

despair sisters but one of them is werewolf bc i like werewolves and i like mukuro

(self indulgent danganronpa content again after all these years??? more likely than you think)

"I love okegom. DNI boyfriend to death and TCOAAL fans"

"I love yaoi. DNI fujoshis"

"I love RPF/toxic yaoi/doomed yuri/selfcest/selfshipping. DNI proshippers"

"I love mentally ill people. DNI if paraphile or paraphilic disordered"

do you hear yourself?

people will indulge in media that has the most fucked up twisted and problematic stories with unredeemable characters then proceed to turn around and say dni proshippers

powder x ekko is cute tho. really cute two nerds, who would have made a really cute couple in au. but jinx? jinx is jinx. a queen of disaster. the way ekko feels about her is full of grief, mourning the loss of what could have been. "in another universe" kind of thing.

for silco, she was perfect. two fucking freaks, destined to destroy each other. one raising the other, watering the poison flower rather than cutting it. for silco, the poison flower was still a flower. even after the flower grew tall until it bloomed and the poison eventually killed him. he knew that the flower was poisonous, yet he loved it. no one except silco would have watered the poisonous little flower. carrying the burden of poison kept her awake at night, hearing whispers and climbing to his bed for silence. she didn't want to poison the only one, who went down with her poison. but what can she do? she is born poisonous. she is jinx.

when they’re out in public jinx is the type to go “you’re the best sister ever!” and then kiss vi on the lips in front of strangers

the worst part about being a closeted proshipper is when one of your friends mentions a relationship (platonic or familial) that you ship very hard and you have to pretend you aren’t insane about them

time for the crux of my argument which is:

you cannot discern between romanticization and depiction in reliable way and the "you know it when you see it" way of determining that is not foolproof. barring definitions ("is selfcest incest?" "is adoptive family incest?" "is found family incest?") you have no idea the person's history between the trauma they depict. you have no idea whether or not they project onto the dominant or the submissive. even when the dominant experiences negative consequences people call that romanticization. the person posting cannibal imagines is romanticizing in the same way that incest shippers do.