this post is about og elias bouchard and his funky little guyification and vaguely about capitalism/tory reading of jonah being too literal/specific when tma exploration of systems is broader but this absolutely reads as a blorbocism post i’m sure
the way people are inclined to believe jonah magnus who doesn’t believe in fate/bloodlines and who longed to become an immaterial extension of a fear ‘deity’ is more likely to be tory-aligned than og!elias who was raised to believe he is better and more deserving simply because he is a bouchard is honestly. very strange
sex-repulsed jon is fine and excellent and i love that for everyone generally however i am kind of tired of people acting like that’s the only way for an asexual to be
Happy One Year Anniversary of MAG200! 👁
making thibgs... to send people
aroace spec jonelias... save me...
aroace spec jonelias
save me aroace spec jonelias
Stupid thing i made
my horrible horrible wife (regency twink obsessed with horrors beyond human comprehension)
apologist? not necessarily. explainer? perhaps. understander? intimately. enjoyer? greatly. sexualizer? frequently,
the secret sauce of jonah magnus is refusing to become a victim in a world where that is fundamentally impossible so you damn your whole species to the slaughterhouse for the privilege of being its administrator hope this helps <3
hawke/merrill/isabela is very funny to me bc all i can imagine is isabela out on her own imagining hawke and merrill are soooo happy and complete and better off without her meanwhile we cut to a totally romantic scene in the hawke estate that’s suddenly interrupted by “... i wish isabela was here” “yeah i also wish isabela was here” “we should go see isabela” “isabela <3”
they/them/any | 20 | jonah magnus’ correspondent, casual dragon age enjoyer | eng/ukr
190 posts