I'm Sick Of Hearing The Phrase "start A Family" When They Really Mean "have Kids". Because YOU DON'T

Pass it on!!!

Wish Defense I: The 'Complaints'

“Be to her virtues very kind, Be to her faults a little blind.” ― Matthew Prior

Disney's Wish was actually great and I'm here to defend it.

I'd like to start by negating most of, if not all, the 'complaints' this film's been getting. Please join me as I do this in 12 brief points:

Asha is a great protagonist. She is not just 'quirky' or one-dimensional: she's caring, strong, beautifully flawed, and doesn't solve every problem on her own; the movie makes a point of every one of these. I never saw her as a clone of someone like Mirabel or Anna. And she does have a character arc: she matures and learns to work hard for what she believes in. She learns that doing the right thing is difficult, but it's necessary. All this makes for a beautifully put-together character that gets through challenges and comes out stronger. Why aren't people talking about how great that is?

Magnifico is a great villain. He's an amalgam of familiar villains like Maleficent, Ursula, and Gaston, done in ways that seem fresh and unique. I've seen a lot of people say his motivation seems to change every few minutes or so, but I disagree. Him using his traumatic past is his excuse for his bad behaviour: that's what narcissists do. Just look at Mother Gothel and all her gaslighting. He was always a self-absorbed jerk who wants everyone under his heel, and whose darkness just got revealed more and more. And his 'villain shtick' is a cool and terrifying one: stripping people of their hopes and dreams to make them docile subjects who depend on him. He takes away their agency, essentially their souls and who they are as people. That is the bad thing he's been doing from Day 1, it's what makes him a villain: the film tells us that. How can people defend him? It's like people defending Gaston all over again. He's a great villain in that he goes against the values the story holds dear, challenges the protagonist in personal ways, is wonderful to hate, and is rightfully depicted as in the wrong for doing bad things. He's the selfish one, not Asha as the 'critics' are claiming. Why aren't people talking about that?

Star is a great secondary character. He is intentionally supposed to be a character that harkens back to those like Jiminy Cricket or Timothy Q. Mouse (I have a very personal connection with Dumbo, so this was important to me). People are REALLY misinterpreting that concept art of them: Star and Asha were never supposed to have a romance because Human Star would look like her grandfather. And 'Starboy' would just be a copy of Peter Pan or Genie, which people would definitely slam, thus I'm glad they changed him. See point 11 for more on Star and why his current form is the one they went with. People just care about having a Jack Frost clone (if they did go that route, they'd probably be slammed for copying Dreamworks, knowing 'critics'). The idea of a mute, magical sidekick, something that we haven't seen since Tinker Bell, is a pretty fun one that feels new and cool. And it's important to note that he never grants anyone's wish: he just helps out, letting Asha and others know that they themselves have to make it come true. Why aren't people talking about that?

I was really worried Valentino was going to be little more than a gag, but he wasn't. He helps out here and there, especially when aiding the Teens in freeing the wishes, proving his importance to the narrative. Plus I did find him pretty funny.

The Teens do stand on their own. I went into the movie knowing they were going to be new versions of the 7 Dwarfs, but each of them felt like their own unique person to me, especially Dahlia and Simon.

The animation is gorgeous: you have to watch it in HD or 4k, which people are doing for other films like Spider-Verse or Nimona, just not this one. It is far from 'lazy' or 'Disney Junior level': it harkens back to art styles Walt Disney himself loved. I can't believe they managed to replicate the feel of classic Disney backgrounds, like Snow White or Sleeping Beauty, so perfectly with modern technology. It looks like a painting, or a tapestry. Disney movies are still beautiful. Why aren't people talking about that?

The music is great: I've caught myself singing every song at least thrice. Each song brings something to the table. 'This is the Thanks I Get' fits Magnifico's character, and is something in the same vein as Gaston's song; you cannot tell me that one rent line is worse than 'nobody spits like Gaston'. I still get chills listening to 'This Wish' and its reprise. I don't know how people online are starting to think it's a bad song, but now others are just jumping on the bandwagon. You can see Asha's love and struggles within the song, and it even has the melody of 'Part of Your World'; how can you hate that? I've seen so many people personally connect with that song, myself included... Why aren't people talking about that?

'At All Costs' was never a love song between Asha and Star: Julia Michaels just wanted a love song (find that Variety article), and now it can be used for all kinds of love. I actually did tear up watching that sequence for the first time, seeing Asha hold her grandfather's wish dearly in her arms. I've seen people say it reminds them of what a parent would sing to their child, like 'You'll Be in My Heart', and I think that's just so wonderful and heartfelt. Why aren't people talking about that?

I don't have the actual post, but I'd like to bring attention back to what an artist on the film said: every 'Easter Egg' is meaningfully placed, a tribute to what has inspired generations. Not one of them felt shoehorned in to me. This movie is a tribute, a love letter, a celebration of what people have loved for 100 years. Why aren't people talking about that?

Magnifico's defeat is far from silly. It makes sense given the rules the world of the film runs on: the fact that 'we are made of stars' is a good Chekov's gun that carries a lot of meaningful importance. Each of us is special, each of us has magic, and each of us has hope. And this is where evil dies and good endures: Magnifico cannot comprehend that anyone but himself is worth anything, thus why he cannot quell this and it is the reason for this downfall. He, the villain, loses because he lacks the virtues the heroes possess. Why aren't people talking about that?

The story of this film is special: as confirmed by the staff, the film is an allegory for Walt Disney's life, and the story of Disney overall. Asha is Walt Disney, Star is Mickey Mouse: a magical force of creativity and inspiration that lights up a dark time. Because of the special nature of this, even though I'm a die-hard Disney fan, I'm fine with there not being any romance in this film (even though I'd like it back someday). This was intentionally made as a simple film à la Snow White, which was meant to be a happy, hope-giving film for people back in the 1930s. Just like this film is supposed to be now. One last time: why aren't people talking about that?

This is the first of a few posts I'll make defending this movie, so for other Wish fans out there, please stick around. I don't care if I get dragged for this: I'd rather stick up for my beliefs and defend myself my way than let online bullies like Schaffrillas, Aldone, or Astor Rhymemaster stop me from loving something I really enjoyed. I really hope this movie gets the Atlantis treatment and becomes a beloved cult classic down the line. Until next time.

I plan to see Disney's new Snow White movie.

And I want everyone in the real world to see it and give it the praise and commercial success it deserves, so that those far-right extremists on the Internet will pay for their toxic, oponionated, disrespectful and blind hatred and have no power over Disney, or Hollywood no matter what they say.

Why You're Wrong About Rachel Zegler

This is a long post, but there's a lot of context missing from the Rachel Zegler "discourse" that I thought I could add with my history of watching this unfold from the beginning.

The Snow White Thing

You probably know this part. There's a curated video of Rachel going viral, framed to make her seem like she's never seen Snow White, she hates the story, she hates the character, she's ungrateful, and single-handedly ruined Disney's brand. The clips from these videos are not new— they were released nearly a year ago in September 2022 and nobody cared about them at the time. Why? Because all the full interviews she did that day at the Disney Exo in 2022 showed a young, charming woman who was excited and proud to be cast in an iconic role. The interviews were very well received and it was a non story. Now that it's been edited down and cut together in a malicious way, and the people sharing them are purposefully misquoting her, they've twisted the context. Normally, this would be a non controversy. Even if that video wasn't taken out of context and spliced together to make her seem like she hates the film, most people wouldn't care. The issue is the response to the video.

Let's get this out of the way: Rachel Zegler doesn't hate Snow White. She relayed that she was afraid of the forest scene as a child and didn't revisit it again until after she was cast in the role. She has since then watched it several times and has expressed for YEARS before that interview came out that she was incredibly honored and grateful to be playing such an iconic Disney princess. If you watch the full videos that those clips came from, this comes across immediately to anyone with their own mind. If you hate someone for being scared of something as a child, I don't know what to tell you. If the role was being given to the biggest Snow White fan, you would be correct that she doesn't deserve it. Unfortunately for you, this role requires talent and Rachel has the Golden Globe and critical acclaim from people who matter within the industry (her peers and critics).

You know who does hate their beloved characters in beloved franchises but the general public still applauds them? Harrison Ford, Sean Connery, Daniel Craig, and Robert Pattinson. They've all expressed outright contempt for the roles and the films they were part of, but nobody cared. People had fun with their quotes but they still respected them. Rachel said nothing even closely resembling their remarks, but she's being torn to shreds. Are we seeing a pattern here?

Rachel never said a single bad thing about the character or the animated film— she said that it was outdated and that set people over the edge, foaming at the mouth to have her burned at the stake. If you think it would be perfectly fine to have a movie about an abused 14 year old girl run away to play housemaid for a bunch of men, get kissed in her sleep/death by an adult man, and then wake up to fall into his arms in 2024, that's certainly a hot take. If you're against remakes, direct your ire at Disney. But if you truly think that plot would work with young girls today, you're the one who's out of touch. It would do far more harm than good to portray a young woman in that light.

She also never said that there was anything wrong with romance or love. She said that the new Snow White wasn't only dreaming of that. I can't stress enough that this wasn't her decision… she was describing the plot of the new film that was written by Greta Gerwig and approved by Disney. There's a prince in the film and he will also have a more developed personality and storyline. If you have a problem with the writing, wait until it comes out so you can write your strongly worded letter to Greta. If you have a problem with the concept in general, take it up with Disney. There's no need for you to be defensive over hurting the legacy of a multi-billion dollar company or a 87 year old cartoon written by a proud racist antisemite. This is the most confusing part of the hate campaign to me because it wasn't even her opinion— she was literally describing the plot of the film she had nothing to do with. It also isn't a new thing. Disney actors have been promoting their newer films this way for years.

It's perfectly okay to like things that are problematic. It's becoming an issue that we refuse to acknowledge that maybe some things we love are harmful. What we can't do is justify why it's not problematic, and in fact everyone who calls it out is the problem and NOT their precious cartoon. The 1937 Snow White was an amazing feat of animation. It's a classic for a reason. But it was also Hitler's favorite film and was directed by a white supremacist (the one who is "rolling in his grave" due to Rachel's existence, according to his son). Things don't exist in a vacuum and we can't ignore the bad parts.

How We Got Here:

The thing that everyone is missing is the source of this campaign. This started in September of 2020 when transphobic actor Gina Carano made fun of trans people by changing her pronouns to beep/bop.boop. Rachel indirectly called her out by coming to the defense of the trans community.

She never called out Gina by name (though she rightfully could have). Mind you, Rachel's first film hadn't come out yet. Nobody knew who she was outside of those of us who were anticipating West Side Story and were fans of her covers on YouTube. She was a "nobody" in the industry. Take this part with a grain of salt because I can't confirm it, but Gina and her fans directly blame Rachel for her being banned from Twitter. Again, I really don't think that matters as she's harmful to the trans community and shouldn't have a platform. What does matter is that fans of Gina (which, let's be real, are just fans of transphobia) have been stalking Rachel's every move since then. Unfortunately for them, there wasn't much they could use against her other than to call her woke and #snowbrown when she was cast a year later as the Disney princess. The noise has always been there, but unless you were a fan of hers, you probably didn't hear about it. It wasn't until two years after this that they had something else against her.

If you've recently seen a video of Rachel crying circulating that claims to be her reaction to the recent Snow White backlash, it's an old video. It's from a vlog from her youtube channel posted in June 2022. It was in response to these exact same transphobic anti-woke conservatives who thought that they had something when she did an interview on the red carpet of the Shazam premiere. When asked why she joined the DC universe, she responded "I needed a job." It was generally well received by most people who thought it was cute and funny, but those who were waiting in the shadows latched onto it as an excuse to send her death threats.

The video was also about a month after she was invited to present at the 2022 Oscars and was made to seem like she bullied the Academy (as a no name newcomer, mind you) into letting her attend. In reality, a fan left a comment on her Instagram asking what she was wearing to the event. She responded that she wasn't invited but would be rooting for everyone from her couch in her boyfriend's pajamas. It was the public who demanded she get an invite and the Oscar's must have agreed that it was very odd that the lead actress of a film that was nominated for Best Film wouldn't get an invite. Whether it was an oversight on their part or a scheduling issue with Rachel's filming, I truly think there was no malicious intent from either party. Keep in mind, she used to be very active with her fans (she's a huge fangirl of things herself and has always had a strong relationship with her fans) and she wasn't used to her comments becoming articles and national tv segments. This was the first time it happened to her. It appears she learned that she's not just a girl who posts on YouTube anymore and she's going to be put under a microscope for every move she makes. She has since shut down her Instagram comments and rarely interacts with fans outside of liking comments these days because of this.

I know this is long, but I need people to understand where this is all coming from. It didn't just happen out of nowhere. It's an orchestrated campaign built by violent conservatives, and thousands of women who saw Barbie this summer are hopping on the bandwagon to beat another woman into submission because they have a lot of internalized misogyny to deal with. She's not smug, you just hate women. It's okay to find people annoying, but it's valuable to look into why you think that. If you see a confident young woman expressing views that don't actually harm anyone and you think she needs to be "humbled" and "put in her place" by the entire internet dogpiling her, you've lost your mind. Using "body language experts" (fake job) to diagnose her as a psychopath is so vile. Everytime someone mentions her name online, the comments beneath it are full of the most violent, misogynistic, racist things I've ever seen. If you're contributing to that, you've chosen your side. Reevaluate or seek help.

I'm tired of seeing this happen to young women. We let this happen to Jennifer Lawrence, Brie Larson, Millie Bobby Brown, Halle Bailey, and Jenna Ortega. It's one thing to call out celebrities and hold them accountable when they're doing something actively harmful, but that's not what this is about. That's never been what this is about. We pick these girls to pieces and examine them and pull them apart to justify our hatred of young women who rise to success too quickly for our liking. We dogpile and try to stamp out the flame before they burn too bright. Barbie is still in theaters and you all loved it, yet you're demanding that a bright girl with a big future be small and submissive and humbled because you have issues. That's not feminism. You're just the girls who would have bullied Weird Barbie for using her hands too much when she talks.

Harris will be president and America will be better than it ever was.

I don't entirely disagree with you, but I think, you're overreacting too much. Also, live action remake movies can be good, I have 3 examples, to prove this, Popeye (1980),

Speed Racer (2008)

and Charlotte's Web (2006).

In my personal honest opinion, Disney is better at that sort of thing, than DreamWorks and Universal will be here. Just remember, the old versions are not getting replaced anytime soon, even if these new movie versions exist.

As a long time httyd fan who has been heavily involved in the fandom since the first movie and who has spent years working in the animation industry, I’d like to share my thoughts on the new httyd movie. Keep in mind, this is just my personal opinion and it's completely fine if you disagree with me. I just want to say a little something about all this that really bothers me.

The core reason that Dreamworks and Universal made this film is that it’s a quick and easy cash grab for them. Thats it. They don’t care about telling a good story or making a “better” version of the original movie for fans or even having an accurate portrayal of the characters/story. It’s purely about money. They know that fans of the original film will go see this movie, whether it’s good or bad. And those guaranteed ticket sales are all that matter to the studios. And with Universal, it has the added bonus of being a cheap promotional and merchandising opportunity for the new HTTYD land in Orlando that opens around the same time that the film is premiering in theaters.

And to help the studios make even more money out of this, they are using non-unionized VFX companies around the world to make this film, so that they can get cheaper labor and push the artists to do more that would be against American union standards. The same thing has probably happened with the costuming and fabrication for the filming, hence why the costumes look un-weathered and the sets look cheap. They don’t want to pay for the extra time and effort that it would take to make the practical bits of the production look good.

On top of all this, Dreamworks has already announced that they’re shutting down all their in-house animation projects in favor of using AI and outsourcing projects to cheaper international non-union studios.

With all this in mind, I just can’t support this film and I will not be seeing it in theaters. And I hope that others will do the same.

The only way to stop all these horrible “live action” remakes (which are actually just realistically animated remakes) is to not buy tickets to see them. Money is all that matters to these studios, and if they don’t make any money off of it, then they will stop and try something different. Maybe they'll even go back to focusing on original stories!

That’s the power that we hold as audiences. Our wallets help drive the decisions that the executives make. So support unique storytelling and gorgeous cinematography in movies. Support indie films. Support animators as they're fighting for fair pay and better contracts. But don't support a mediocre shot-for-shot remake riding on the coattails of an already successful film.

And I just want to wrap all this up by saying I have absolutely no hate towards anyone that has worked on the new film. Toothless looks incredible and I know the artists and creatives involved in this project did the best they could with what they were given.

But I also know that those same artists have so many more brilliant ideas that they would’ve loved to be given the creative freedom to do. I just wish hollywood would be willing to take a chance and let them do it.

The Satire for Unrealistic Expectations and Unrealistic Thinking (or the Marketplace of Negativity) (TUMBLR Edition)

DISCLAIMER:

The following fanfic is a satire making fun of toxic rage bait YouTube channels and toxic DeviantArt accounts that cover cartoons, movies and TV shows as well as showing my defense for any movie Disney has made lately, whether it be a original animated film or a live action remake. This is not meant to attack anyone or be taken seriously at all, with the exception of the message that it's sending. This is also inspired by gamerjerk450's DeviantArt fic, Satire IV: Two-Dimensional Thinking with a few differences. Any constructive criticism is allowed. No copyright infringement intended at all.

And no flames, blind hatred or spam allowed! Thanks and let's begin.

It was the year 2025, specifically March 19,. it would be almost 2 days before the worldwide release of Disney's live-action remake of Snow White. Lots of kids and adults all over the world were nervous and excited about the film's release. And everyone at Disney as well as the cast and crew are proud of what they had done. Despite some fears, here and there, they were still sure, that the movie would be a smash hit at the box office, outgrossing its large budget and being praised for being a new Snow White for a new generation.

However, many miles away from Disney's headquarters stood an old condemned building. inside it consisted of just countless people, chatting and having conversations, like normal people. Around them were tables full of cake, ice cream, cookies, tea, alcohol and all kinds of sweet treats, with soda and juice on the side and a sign that read, "Mad Tea Party", right next to them.

Their discussions were soon interrupted with the blow of a dog whistle. This was done by the group's leader, who wore a T-shirt that said Make Disney Great Again on it, who came in with a henchman who wore a black shirt with nothing on it and a hench-woman with badly dyed red hair with a shirt that said, Go Woke Go Broke on it.

The man leading the Anti-Disney Club then proceeded to speak into a megaphone.

Speaker: Excuse me, everyone, may i have your attention, please? Good. Now, thank you all for coming here today. My name is Nick Sorenson, but you can call me by my online alias ToonEGuy. With me, i have MechaRandom42 and Will Jordan the Critical Drinker.

MechaRandom: It's a honor to be here.

Drinker: Does anyone know why you're here today?

Rando: Yeah, to save Disney and the animation and film industries from themselves!

Everyone: Yeah!

Nick: Excelent! This saves us time for explaining all of it. I've brought some refreshments to pass the time and stuff. So, here's the plan: we strike at 6 PM. sharp, march right to Disney's HQ, and protest our hearts out until all the old greedy bastards and woke employees cave in. Any questions?

Random #2: Yeah, it's close to 4 PM, right now. What should we do until then?

Nick: Good question. Before we strike, we'll pass the time by watching the last good Disney movie, Winnie the Pooh from 2011, from before those lying bastards played with our emotions by promising to make a new hand-drawn movie every 2 years, but it all just a lie to try and kill of traditional animation in favor of soulless overrated CGI movies, woke Marvel, woke Star Wars and soulless woke live-action remakes! But enough of that, let's watch.

So the Anti-Disney Club and all the internet trolls, Cartoonaboos, purists and nostalgiatards spent the next 70+ minutes watching the 2011 Winnie the Pooh movie.

Once it was over, they had all begun preparing for their protest march. Soon, they were ready to set out holding up various signs that read stuff like, "End Wokeness", "Restore Walt's Dignity", "2D is Best D", "Animation is for Everyone", "No Live Action", "Enough with the Remakes", "Go Woke, Go Broke", and other phrases.

MechaRandom: Alright, this is it, guys!

Critical Drinker: This is the day we take back what's rightfully ours!

Nick: Yeah, and this is the day we show those hacks at Disney that they messed with the wrong crowd! Today, they will know the name Anti-Disney Club! This will be the biggest day of our lives! Who's with us?

Everyone: Yeah!

Nick: That's exactly what I wanted to hear! Now, let's fight!

However, as they started marching, they overheard something that ground their gears.

Little girl (singing): Let it go, let it go, can't hold it back anymore, let it go, let it go.

Nick (into megaphone): Hey, stop singing that song, you little brat! You should be ashamed of yourself! You're part of the problem!

The girl ran off crying to her mom and told her to call the police.

Over at Disney HQ, everyone was having an office party, to celebrate the upcoming release of Snow White 2025. A bunch of executives, animators, live action crew members and the cast were discussing amongst themselves. However, the conversations were soon interrupted when one executive spotted something bad in the distance.

Executive: Come here, everyone. I think, I we've got an emergency.

Everyone did as told.

Executive #2: What is the problem?

Yep, there was a problem. It was a burning Mickey Mouse ear-hat. Then they heard so many faint shouting, and they could just barely make out the words, "DOWN WITH DISNEY!", from the screams. Some of them even got X notifications on their phones.

Rachel Zegler: "Cancel the Snow White remake"? "End wokeness"? "Restore traditional animation"? Oh god, not those people again!

Executive: What do you mean?

Rachel Zegler: They harassed, threatened and slandered us over these remakes for too long.

Executive #2: We got to alert Mr. Iger about this.

They all made their way to Disney CEO Bob Iger's office.

Executive #2: Mr. Iger, we got a problem!

Bob: What is it?

Executive: There's some toxic protesters out there who want us to cancel the Snow White remake and other remakes and sequels.

Rachel Zegler: And they are led by those who lied about me and Hallie Bailey and others.

Bob: Don't worry, I'll just force the guards on them, right now!

Iger then pressed a large red button that said, "IN CASE OF PROTESTERS AND BOYCOTTERS" on it, and before they knew it, the Anti-Disney Club were hounded by security guards who proceeded to drag them off the premises and, for some of the pestiest protesters and/or boycotters, pepper sprayed them. However, a select few, including Nick, Drinker and MechaRandom managed to avoid them somehow and made their way into the building.

Soon, they reached the main office, where the party took place. Everyone stared at them in discomfort.

Nick: Hacks! All of you! You're all hacks! What do you think, you're doing!?

Executive #3: We're trying to run a business.

Nick: Liar! You're trying to ruin animation! You want to burn this industry to the (BLEEP)ing ground!

Drinker: Yeah, and you won't stop until all animation is CGI and soulless photorealsitic live action remakes!

MechaRandom: You and Pixar even ruined each other. You're even hating men!

Executive #4: Who the hell do you people think you are, just storming in here and insulting us and hating us!

Nick: I'm Nick Sorenson of the Anti-Disney Club! And we are here to save the industry from itself!

Rachel Zegler: How, by bullying people like me for doing my job!?

Bob Iger stood in to defend his company and everyone in t.

Nick: You! You are turning Disney into soulless corporate filth! You don't care about quality, all you want is money!

Bob: That's NOT true! We're just making the movies we want to make, in the ways we want to make them!

Nick: You are ruining our childhoods, Slob Iger! You've even ruined the company and tarnished it's vey name, especilaly with it's inclusitivity agenda! What do you think Walt Disney would say about this?

Then a lightning strike hits the ground and out of it comes a faceless ghost, shaped like Walt Disney himself.

Walt's ghost: I am the ghost of Walt Disney and I'd say that you all need to calm down and retreat immediately!

Drinker: What? Is this some kind of prank?

MechaRandom: Shut up!

Nick: Yes, Walt Disney. Please tell everyone what you think of what they are doing to your company!

Walt's ghost: To be honest, I think, they are all doing an expectionaly good job, keeping my company alive and current.

MechaRandom: Screw you, guys! I'm out!

MechaRandom leaves to surrender herself to the police.

Drinker: I'm late for dinner!

Drinker also leaves.

Nick then goes mad.

Nick: What!? That's ludicrous! They're ruining your company! How can you just be okay with this?!

Walt's ghost: As long as our primary goal remains, "to bring fun, magic and enjoyment to people's lives", the methods to do so whether it be original or a remake are irrelevant.

Nick: That's not their goal! They just want to make money and brainwash the masses into thinking their trash is good! Nobody wants this (BLEEP)!

Walt's ghost: Correction! YOU are among the vocal minority of people online who doesn't want this (BLEEP). And that type of person is a toxic anti-fan and a blind hater!

Nick: What do you mean!?

Walt's ghost: Have you ever thought that what modern audiences, or rather people in the real world want is different from what you want? People don't watch our movies, because we brainwash them, they watch our movies, because they love them. Because they bring smiles to their faces. It's secretly the same with live-action remakes, too, you just don't know it, yet.

Nick: No, that's wrong! I just know it! CGI animated movies and live-action remakes are inferior and completely soulless!

Walt's ghost: CGI is capable of more than hand-drawn animation, is more eye-catching and is less of a struggle to animate as well. Live action is also easy, because you have everything in front of you and go beyond imagination better. They are the best uses of the latest and greatest technology ever created. Plus today's movies have become more inclusive for the better, letting anyone of any cultural background in the whole world see themselves in every character depicted. To not make use of CGI technology or diversity and inclusion would be like filming a modern day movie using a camera from the 1900s. And to just do original stuff 100 percent and not have live-action remakes or sequels, the world be a boring place to live in.

Nick: Well, everything from my childhood in the 90s was more original and less corporate!

Walt's ghost: You mean, the decade when other studios tried and failed to be more like us? The decade that had even more corporate stuff like A Troll in Central Park? Face it, man! You're NOT trying to "save the industry", you just want to "save the industry for yourself", because you refuse to move on from the past and realize that filmmaking and technologies for live action and animation have evolved phenomonally today and is making it easier for anyone to get into the film industry. You refuse to agknowledge that these movies (whether they be originals, sequels, or remakes) aren't just moneymakers, but they're also beloved modern classics for anyone of all generations to enjoy. We'll still have the original versions of these stories available, but we'll tell them in a new way that builds on their foundation. To cancel the live action remake of Snow White and boycott it would mean to not only put the time, effort and money spent making it in vain, but also to disappoint anyone who really does want to see it. And at the end of the day, would that be ruining the industry?

Nick: But you're killing off traditional animation and making everything woke!

Walt's ghost: You know, I'm not even gonna respond to that, you're a madman! This isn't the past anymore! We're not in the 1930s-1990s anymore! And it's not even the COVID era anymore! You have to keep moving forward and adapt to modern times, like my company does!

Nick: Well, I think, you're a fake! The real Walt Disney would never say that and he would be rolling in his grave! Come on, ADC, let's show these assholes what we're made of! Down with Disney! Down with Disney! Down with Disney! Down with...

Nick then realized that his members were silent and planning to quit.

Nick: What re you guys doing, protest with me!

ADC Member #1: Actually, he's right, Nick. Doing this would hold the industry back.

ADC Member #2: Yeah, these protests and boycotts are all dumb and pointless! You and all those other haters are the ones brainwashing us!

Soon, they all tossed their signs to the floor to burn and gave on protesting and boycotting Disney.

Nick's fury (haha) was growing.

Nick: I'll get you, you impostor!

Just as Nick was about to charge, Walt used his ghostly powers to strike him with lighting, making him still and powerless.

Rachel Zegler: Thank you! Now, let's take this toxic hater to the cops and court!

Bob: Agreed! Nick, you and the other haters who have not come to their senses will be placed under arrest for breaking and entering and attempting boycotts. As for those who are not protesting anymore, you will still be fined, for all this.

ADC Member: But we're already are guilty and we're very sorry.

Bob: All is forgiven. We're still going to testify in court, next week.

One Week Later. The Supreme Court makes a verdict against those who attempted to boycott recent Disney movies.

Judge: All rise.

Everyone in the court rises.

Judge: the Anti-Disney Club, consisting of you toxic anti-woke grifters, conservatives and nostalgia-blinded purists.

Nick: Your honor!

Judge: As punishment for breaking and entering and boycotting Disney, I sentence you and other members of the Anti-Dinsey Club who haven't come to their senses to watching every modern Disney movie that is CGI and live-action on repeat all week starting tomorrow.

And live from NY, it's Saturday night! SNL reference.

THE END.

Thanks for reading and have a nice day. And be sure to check out Rachel Zegler in Disney's Snow White, when it hits theaters everywhere, March 21, 2025.